Provider Digital Service - Service Assessment
...open source code but recommend that the team should aim to publish all source code and should not attempt to evaluate usefulness. By doing this the SFA can allow other...
...open source code but recommend that the team should aim to publish all source code and should not attempt to evaluate usefulness. By doing this the SFA can allow other...
...12 Yes 13 No 14 Yes 15 No 16 Yes 17 No 18 Yes 19 Yes 20 Yes 21 No 22 No 23 No 24 No 25 Yes 26 Yes...
...12 Yes 13 No 14 Yes 15 No 16 Yes 17 Yes 18 No 19 Yes 20 Yes 21 Yes 22 Yes 23 Yes 24 Yes 25 Yes 26 Yes...
...support to their users. Source Code The team weren’t able to talk the assessment panel through their plan for making all new source code open and reusable or, where necessary,...
...didn’t recognise. We’ve since implemented a new tracking code, which was easy to do using this tracking code generator from Google. To set up a code, you just need to...
...12 Yes 13 Yes 14 No 15 Yes 16 Yes 17 Yes 18 No 19 Yes 20 Yes 21 No 22 No 23 No 24 No 25 Yes 26 Yes...
...at GDS. Jupyter notebooks meet Python Data scientists at GDS use Jupyter notebooks for the rapid development and prototyping of solutions to data science problems. In particular, it allows code,...
...than taking an “Intro to R” course months before they ever get to use it. Paired programming, where two or more analysts code together with one “driving” and the other...
...evidence on why some source code is not open; eg authentication libraries. They were also able to provide evidence of how they will continue to review that position. collecting, measuring...
...links to GOV.UK content for further information are added, where user research demonstrates the need. Service standard point 15 - Re: Open source code The service have not yet made...